EN
Protecting Every Surface, Inside and Out.
Product
offers a cost-effective solution with its high pullout resistance force and
excellent performance.
- Product as PE (Linear Low-Density Polyethylene)
- Coated with PET (Polyethylene Terephthalate)
- High-strength yarn.
| No | Strength | Width | Length/Roll | Thickness |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1 | 20 KN | 90±3 mm | 150m | 2.3±0.5 mm |
| 2 | 30 KN | 90±3 mm | 100m | 2.6±0.5 mm |
| 3 | 50 KN | 90±3 mm | 100m | 3.4±0.5 mm |
| 4 | 75 KN | 90±3 mm | 100m | 4.5±0.5 mm |
| 5 | 90 KN | 90±3 mm | 100m | 5.5±0.5 mm |
Conventional Flat Reinforcement
Material Cross Section
Cross Section of Reinforcing
Materials with Protrusions
※
Reinforcements with protrusions provide superior friction and pullout resistance compared to flat materials.
Higher Pullout Resistance Force (Pr) results in better functionality and effectiveness as a reinforcing material.
This can be derived through pullout or shear tests, the friction capability of extensible Geosynthetic Strip reinforcement is determined by the Friction Coefficient Ci.
This can be derived through pullout or shear tests, the friction capability of extensible Geosynthetic Strip reinforcement is determined by the Friction Coefficient Ci.
Pullout Resistance
Test Results
Pullout resistance coefficient Ci
tested under identical comparative
conditions
tested under identical comparative
conditions
| Type | Geogrid (Knitted) | KORESOL® | POCKET -TIE® |
|---|---|---|---|
| Geogrid | Geostrip | Geostrip | |
| Vertical Stress(kPa) | 50 | 50 | 50 |
| Pullout Stress(kPa) | 28.8 | 27.7 | 41.9 |
| Pullout resistance Coefficient(Ci) |
0.89 | 0.85 | 1.29 |
POCKET-TIE® has the best pullout resistance effect.
(a) 40 mm granular material
(b) 120 mm granular material
※ The tests were conducted at the
Geosynthetic Strip shows significantly higher performance than Geogrid.
